# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Solar Pro4 leads 40.1 to 22.6.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 33K.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 245 | 121 |
| Context | 33K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1416 |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1385 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Solar Pro4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.
