# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.9 vs 33.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 8B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 8B leads 33.4 to 22.4.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen3 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.9 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 239 | 237 |
| Context | 33K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $1 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.41 | 136.17 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.9 vs 33.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 8B does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 8B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.