# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.3 to 22.6.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen3 14B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 245 | 225 |
| Context | 33K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $1 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 14B does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.