# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2-72B in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 32.9 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 49% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and 38.5% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.9 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 239 | 294 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | 54% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.41 | 125.27 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1235 |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 79.1% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1195 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Qwen2-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.7 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen2-72B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.