# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 41.2 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 23.3% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and 56.3% for Qwen2.5-Max.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.9 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 239 | 142 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1359 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.41 | 132.54 |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | 62.3% |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1369 |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | 1353 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1335 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | 56.3% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen2.5-Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.