# Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-7b-instruct-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 11.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 314 | 245 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.17 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 7.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| DTBench | 47.7% | — |
| LMCA | 6.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.44 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 29.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU | 72.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| WildBench | 73.1% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.