# Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-7b-instruct-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 14.8.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.17 / $0.70 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 320 | 232 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.17 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 7.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 47.7% | — |
| LMCA | 6.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.51 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 29.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU | 72.9% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 73.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct lists at $0.17 and $0.70.

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.5 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.