# Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-7b-instruct-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-1.7B leads 19.2 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 320 | 336 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.17 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
| BALROG | 7.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| DTBench | 47.7% | — |
| LMCA | 6.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.51 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.5% | 38% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU | 72.9% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.1% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 73.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.