# Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-7b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 33.5 to 11.8.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 314 | 179 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.17 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 7.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 47.7% | — |
| LMCA | 6.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.44 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 29.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 34.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| MMLU | 72.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| WildBench | 73.1% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.