# Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-32b-instruct-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 15.3.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 291 | 207 |
| Context | 131K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.