# Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 18.5.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 291 | 229 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.