# Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 15.3.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 291 | 186 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1413 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1364 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.