# Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-32b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 297 | 181 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.7 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.