# Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-7b-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 29.6.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 273 | 87 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen1.5-7B: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | 1478 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1419 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.