# Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-7b-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 29.6.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 273 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen1.5-7B: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.65 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | 1477 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1434 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.