# Qwen1.5-72B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-72b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-72B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 33.2 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 285 | 249 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1165 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1148 | 1079 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1164 | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1135 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1186 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1084 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1104 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1141 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1166 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1137 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-72B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.9 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.