# Qwen1.5-72B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen1.5-72B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-72b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-72B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 37.4 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 282 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1148 | 1018 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1164 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1136 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1135 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1186 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1158 | — |
| LMArena German | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1049 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1142 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1166 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1137 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen1.5-72B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen1.5-72B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.