# Qwen1.5-72B vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-72b-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 11.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B and 72.6% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 282 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | 1456 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen1.5-72B: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1148 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.41 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1164 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.8% | 72.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1136 | 1457 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1135 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1186 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1158 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1084 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1049 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1104 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1142 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1166 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1137 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-72B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Qwen3 Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.