# Qwen1.5-32B vs Yi-Large

> Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#293); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-yi-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 31.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 32.3% for Qwen1.5-32B and 37.7% for Yi-Large.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 293 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
- Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | 47.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 74.4% | 79.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | — |
| LMArena French | 1101 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
- Yi-Large: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Yi-Large?

Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#293); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Yi-Large better for coding?

Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Yi-Large share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.