# Qwen1.5-32B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 288 | 245 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1131 | 1079 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1176 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1058 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1100 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1007 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.1 vs 30.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.