# Qwen1.5-32B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen1.5-32B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 31.6 to 27.3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 288 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1131 | 1018 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1176 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1100 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1007 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen1.5-32B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.