# Qwen1.5-32B vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.8 to 13.5.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 293 | 149 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
- Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1367 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
- Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
- Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
- Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | 1333 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen1.5-32B: —
- Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
- Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1058 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | 1371 |
| LMArena French | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
- Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
- Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1341 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.