# Qwen1.5-32B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 33.0.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 293 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | — |
| LMArena French | 1101 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.