# Qwen1.5-32B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-32b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.0 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 288 | 123 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1131 | 1398 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1418 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1176 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1100 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1058 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1007 | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-32B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.