# Qwen1.5-14B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-14b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 250 | 245 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | 1081 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1079 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1043 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen1.5-14B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.