# Qwen1.5-14B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-14b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 30.8 to 27.3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 250 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1018 |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.