# Qwen1.5-14B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-14b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 29.9.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 250 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1125 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | — |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-14B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.