# Qwen1.5-110B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-110b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.8 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 231 | 245 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1079 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-110B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.