# Qwen1.5-110B vs Step 5 Preview

> Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-110b-vs-step-5-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 5 Preview leads 62.8 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 47.9 |
| Rank | 234 | 58 |
| Context | — | 1.02M |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.70 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
- Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1480 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1564 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
- Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1465 |
| CritPt | — | 20.9% |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
- Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1470 |
| ProofBench | — | 42% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
- Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1470 |

## Multimodal

- Qwen1.5-110B: —
- Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1267 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
- Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1432 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
- Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
- Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
- Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1410 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1447 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-110B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.