# Qwen1.5-110B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-110b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 31.1.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 231 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1150 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-110B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.