# Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.2 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-110b-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 22.7 to 16.6.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 234 | 238 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen1.5-110B: —
- Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.2 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen1.5-110B or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.