# Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen1-5-110b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 234 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen1.5-110B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- Qwen1.5-110B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1151 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen1.5-110B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.