# Qwen Plus vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 34.9 to 22.0.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 204 | 180 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1350 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1359 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1372 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1338 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Qwen Plus or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Trinity Large Thinking share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.
