# Qwen Plus vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Solar Pro4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 36.1 to 22.0.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 204 | 123 |
| Context | 1M | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1398 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1418 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Qwen Plus or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 524K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Solar Pro4 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.