# Qwen Plus vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Qwen Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#210); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 210 | — |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Qwen Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#210); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Qwen Plus or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.