# Qwen Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 21.7.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 204 | 229 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Qwen Plus or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.