# Qwen Plus vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 210 | 156 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.