# Qwen Plus vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 38.0 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 204 | 176 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 81.1% | 77.1% |
| LMCA | 24% | 31% |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.