# Qwen Plus vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 48.1% for Qwen Plus and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 210 | 336 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen Plus: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3-1.7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.