# Qwen Plus vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen Plus leads 38.9 to 22.6.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 210 | 245 |
| Context | 1M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1251 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1228 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.