# Qwen Plus vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 21.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 81.1% for Qwen Plus and 62.9% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $5.60 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 204 | 259 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $5.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1293 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen Plus: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1271 |
| DTBench | 81.1% | 62.9% |
| LMCA | 24% | 13.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.01 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | 63.2% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1245 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1272 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1264 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | 1282 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct lists at $1.40 and $5.60.

### Is Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.