# Qwen Plus vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 18.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 7.4% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 204 | 291 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.3 vs 38.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.