# Qwen Plus vs Qwen Turbo

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-plus-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Plus leads 22.0 to 14.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 26.8 |
| Rank | 204 | 329 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |

## Math

- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
- Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | 56.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen Turbo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.