# Qwen Max vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 22.3.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 230 | 185 |
| Context | 33K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1381 |
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1254 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1355 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is Qwen Max or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.