# Qwen Max vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.1% for Qwen Max and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 230 | 106 |
| Context | 33K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen Max: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | 21% |
| LMArena Math | 1275 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.