# Qwen Max vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.4 vs 35.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 21.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.1% for Qwen Max and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Qwen3 14B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.4 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 226 | 222 |
| Context | 33K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen Max: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1270 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1275 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | — |
| LMArena French | 1329 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1289 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.4 vs 35.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is Qwen Max or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 14B does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.