# Qwen Max vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 56.1% for Qwen Max and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 230 | 336 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen Max: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | — |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1275 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3-1.7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.