# Qwen Max vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 33.3 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 21.8% for Qwen Max and 16.4% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper at $0.66 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 230 | 245 |
| Context | 33K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | 16.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1251 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.66 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is Qwen Max or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Qwen Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 33K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.