# Qwen Max vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen Max and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-max-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 22.3.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 230 | 234 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $6.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1184 |
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1254 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1157 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen Max better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen Max and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen Max or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.