# Qwen-14B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 31.2.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 275 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.